EE Sports World

Your number one source for expert sports analysis on the web

Why Reggie?

I know this isn’t a brand new issue, but I feel it needs to be addressed. Why is Reggie Bush the guy that the NCAA chose to crucify?

After nearly five years of investigation (if you wanna call it that) the NCAA determined that Bush received improper benefits. Duuuh! Basically, a snitch of a sports agent named Lloyd Lake gave Bush’s parents approximately $290,000 so that they could move in to a new home in a much nicer neighborhood. What’s a kid to do in that situation? Well, we know the answer to that.

The aftermath was USC losing 30 football scholarships, vacating wins (including the ’04 national title), and becoming bowl ineligible for the 2010 and 2011 seasons. So you mean the current players have to pay the price for this? That’s garbage. USC was stripped of their copy of  Bush’s Heisman, and was about to take Reggie’s copy also, but he voluntarily gave it to them in an attempt to move on in his life.

What about O.J. Mayo? Cam Newton? Derrick Rose, or just about any good player that played for John Calipari? These are just a few of the more prominent examples of many over the years.

USC has vacated wins from the ’08 basketball season because of O.J. Mayo. But does anyone really care? The only postseason penalty they received was a self-imposed one, and not from the NCAA.

Derrick Rose was technically an ineligible player the entire year he played for Memphis. The NCAA reported his SAT to be completely invalid (meaning someone else took the test for the sizzling fast “slow” guy). Memphis was forced to vacate their 38 wins and final four appearance from ’08. But was there a loss of scholarships or future postseason eligibility? Nope.

In 1996, while at UMass, Marcus Camby received money, jewelry, and even hookers from two different agents. UMass was forced to vacate their final four appearance for that year. But was Marcus Camby pressured by the NCAA to give up his Naismith Award (nat. p.o.y), or Calipari to give up his coach of the year award? Nope.

There is a good amount of evidence pointing that Cam Newton’s father Cecil Newton accepted several hundred thousand in cash from Auburn. They went on to win the BCS title along with a Heisman for Newton. This situation is still under investigation. But of course, it hasn’t been nearly five years yet! So we can expect this thing to drag on I’m sure. Bush’s parents receiving a decent place to live in cost their son, and his alma mater an unprecidented penalty. Let’s see if the same happens to both Auburn and Cam for the actions of Cecil (cash money millionaire) Newton. Will Gene Chizik still have a job? Or will he more likely take the first chance he gets at leaving for the NFL? -wink, wink

My point? Why should future players like USC’s Matt Barkley pay the price for the mistake of someone in the past? Especially considering that those sanctions had not yet been levied at the time of their commitment. Why do agents such as Lloyd Lake and others still have licenses? They knew very well what they were doing was wrong, and took advantage of teenagers who were in much less fortunate situations. Why does a coach like John Calipari, who has put multiple programs under sanctions still get to coach? Everyone knows that he had knowledge of what was going on at UMass and Memphis, yet he continues to enjoy a 4 million dollar annual salary at Kentucky. It seems to me like the NCAA is more concerned with penalizing the very kids that they make money on than the adults (agents, coaches, directors, etc.) who are supposed to be responsible for upholding the integrity of the NCAA laws. What kind of message is this sending?


2 responses to “Why Reggie?

  1. berger987 January 28, 2011 at 9:37 am

    great point, couldn’t agree more. While I think the whole reason they are putting USC out of bowl games is to discourage kids from going there, I think it’s completely unfair to the kids that are already there, like you said. What did they do to deserve this? And I do not understand why USC is the one targeted here, as we all know that there are more out there that are obviously guilty of serious violations.

    There’s got to be another way. I think just taking away the amount of scholarships they can hand out should be bad enough, or at least be creative and think of another way. Maybe take away their tv revenue? something is better than what they’re doing to the kids that didn’t do anything wrong.

  2. dmills14 January 28, 2011 at 1:31 pm

    Great article, perfect point. Couldn’t agree more. It’s just sad that the they can’t punish the people who really are responsible.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: